Feeding Trial Evaluating Mazuri® Nestling Meal Compared to FoNS© as a Diet for Nestling and Fledgling Passerines in a Rehabilitation Setting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53607/wrb.v28.95Keywords:
Songbirds, diet, FoNS©, Mazuri®Abstract
Formula for Nestling Songbirds (FoNS©) is a diet commonly fed to nestling and fledging passerines in rehabilitation settings. The authors evaluated a new formulation, Mazuri® Nestling Meal (MNM), as a potential commercial alternative to FoNS©. The objective was to evaluate the adequacy of MNM compared to FoNS© in birds presented to Tri–State Bird Rescue & Research between 10 June and 10 August 2009. Clutchmates were randomly assigned to FoNS© (control group) or MNM (experimental group) and fed on the same schedule to satiety. Birds received species–appropriate dietary supplementation. Birds were discharged from the study when they moved outside, died, or were removed by a clinician due to health status. The primary endpoint was rate of weight gain, as determined by the percent of admission body weight gained per day. The mean of the control population (n=27) was compared with the experimental population (n=27) using the Student’s t–test, with statistical significance set at p<0.05. The mean percentage body weight gain per day for the control group was 4.57 (95% CI 2.825–6.310). The mean percentage body weight gain per day for the experimental group was 3.89 (95% CI 2.145–5.631). The difference between populations was not statistically significant as indicated by p=0.58. The control group had one death. The experimental group had three deaths and three birds removed by clinician (two subsequently euthanized). With the exception of one inconclusive result, necropsies performed by the overseeing clinician determined cause of death to be unrelated to diet. The statistical analysis and additional qualitative data suggests that MNM is equivalent to FoNS© and an acceptable alternative.
Downloads
References
Brue, R. N. 1994. Chapter 3: Nutrition. Pp. 63–65 in Avian Medicine: Principles and Applications. (Branson W. Ritchie, Greg J. Harrison, and Linda R. Harrison, editors.) Wingers Publishing: Lake Worth, FL.
Finke, Mark, and Diane Winn. 2009. Comments on Case Study: A Split–brood Comparison of Formula for Nestling Songbirds (FoNS©) versus Three Facility–specific Diets (Sheldon and Drake 2009). Wildlife Rehabilitation Bulletin. 27(1): 26–28.
Sheldon, Lani D., and Anna Drake. 2008. Case Study: A Split–brood Comparison of Formula for Nestling Songbirds (FoNS©) versus Three Facility–specific Diets. Wildlife Rehabilitation Bulletin. 26(2): 20–25.
Winn, Diane, and Mark Finke. 2008. Formula for Nestling Songbirds (FoNS©): Update for 2008. Wildlife Rehabilitation Bulletin. 26(1): 17–20.
Winn, Diane. 2002. Formula for Nestling Songbirds: Down Payment on Fitness and Survival. Journal of Wildlife Rehabilitation. 25(3): 13–18.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2021 National Wildlife Rehabilitators Association (NWRA)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright for articles in this journal is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the Wildlife Rehabilitation Bulletin and NWRA. Articles published as open-access in this journal are free to use and share with proper attribution in educational and other non-commercial purposes. To obtain reprint permission for articles that are not open access, please contact the journal editor.