Feeding Trial Evaluating Mazuri® Nestling Meal Compared to FoNS© as a Diet for Nestling and Fledgling Passerines in a Rehabilitation Setting

Authors

  • Eileen Seage University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine
  • Erica A. Miller, DVM Tri-State Bird Rescue & Research, Inc.
  • Elizabeth A. Koutsos, PhD PMI Nutrition

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53607/wrb.v28.95

Keywords:

Songbirds, diet, FoNS©, Mazuri®

Abstract

Formula for Nestling Songbirds (FoNS©) is a diet commonly fed to nestling and fledging passerines in rehabilitation settings. The authors evaluated a new formulation, Mazuri® Nestling Meal (MNM), as a potential commercial alternative to FoNS©. The objective was to evaluate the adequacy of MNM compared to FoNS© in birds presented to Tri–State Bird Rescue & Research between 10 June and 10 August 2009. Clutchmates were randomly assigned to FoNS© (control group) or MNM (experimental group) and fed on the same schedule to satiety. Birds received species–appropriate dietary supplementation. Birds were discharged from the study when they moved outside, died, or were removed by a clinician due to health status. The primary endpoint was rate of weight gain, as determined by the percent of admission body weight gained per day. The mean of the control population (n=27) was compared with the experimental population (n=27) using the Student’s t–test, with statistical significance set at p<0.05. The mean percentage body weight gain per day for the control group was 4.57 (95% CI 2.825–6.310). The mean percentage body weight gain per day for the experimental group was 3.89 (95% CI 2.145–5.631). The difference between populations was not statistically significant as indicated by p=0.58. The control group had one death. The experimental group had three deaths and three birds removed by clinician (two subsequently euthanized). With the exception of one inconclusive result, necropsies performed by the overseeing clinician determined cause of death to be unrelated to diet. The statistical analysis and additional qualitative data suggests that MNM is equivalent to FoNS© and an acceptable alternative.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Eileen Seage, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine

Eileen Seage is a second year veterinary student at the University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine. She has spent three summers as an intern at Tri-State Bird Rescue & Research, Inc. She received the Ed Hiestand Memorial Veterinary Student Scholarship awarded by the NWRA in 2010.

Erica A. Miller, DVM, Tri-State Bird Rescue & Research, Inc.

Erica A. Miller is staff veterinarian at Tri–State Bird Rescue & Research, Inc., in Newark, DE. She also teaches a two-semester introduction to Wildlife Medicine course to first–year veterinary students at the University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine and is a past president, secretary, and board member of NWRA.

Elizabeth A. Koutsos, PhD, PMI Nutrition

Elizabeth Koutsos received her MS and PhD in Nutrition from the University of California Davis. Liz then joined the Animal Science Department at California Polytechnic State University, and in 2006 she became the director of research and technical services at Mazuri Exotic Animal Nutrition, a division of Purina Mills/Land O’Lakes.

References

Brue, R. N. 1994. Chapter 3: Nutrition. Pp. 63–65 in Avian Medicine: Principles and Applications. (Branson W. Ritchie, Greg J. Harrison, and Linda R. Harrison, editors.) Wingers Publishing: Lake Worth, FL.

Finke, Mark, and Diane Winn. 2009. Comments on Case Study: A Split–brood Comparison of Formula for Nestling Songbirds (FoNS©) versus Three Facility–specific Diets (Sheldon and Drake 2009). Wildlife Rehabilitation Bulletin. 27(1): 26–28.

Sheldon, Lani D., and Anna Drake. 2008. Case Study: A Split–brood Comparison of Formula for Nestling Songbirds (FoNS©) versus Three Facility–specific Diets. Wildlife Rehabilitation Bulletin. 26(2): 20–25.

Winn, Diane, and Mark Finke. 2008. Formula for Nestling Songbirds (FoNS©): Update for 2008. Wildlife Rehabilitation Bulletin. 26(1): 17–20.

Winn, Diane. 2002. Formula for Nestling Songbirds: Down Payment on Fitness and Survival. Journal of Wildlife Rehabilitation. 25(3): 13–18.

Downloads

Published

2010-06-30

How to Cite

Seage, E., Miller, E., & Koutsos, E. (2010). Feeding Trial Evaluating Mazuri® Nestling Meal Compared to FoNS© as a Diet for Nestling and Fledgling Passerines in a Rehabilitation Setting. Wildlife Rehabilitation Bulletin, 28(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.53607/wrb.v28.95

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Categories

Most read articles by the same author(s)