The  Importance of Natural History in Wildlife Rehabilitation

Jen Mannas

doi:10.53607/wrb.v34.89

Authors

Jennifer Mannas PAWS Wildlife Center

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53607/wrb.v34.89

Keywords:

Natural history, behavior, enrichment, adaptation, wildlife rehabilitation

Abstract

Wildlife rehabilitation is unique in that it not only considers the welfare of wildlife communities but also the welfare of individual animals. One of the main goals of wildlife rehabilitation is to care for sick, injured and orphaned wild animals for the purpose of releasing them back to the wild. Many of the tens of thousands of wild patients rehabilitators treat each year are directly affected by humans; rehabilitation is seen as a way to mitigate that impact. The diversity of species treated is vast and it is important for wildlife rehabilitators and veterinarians to understand not only basic biology but also the natural history of these species. Nutritional requirements, behavior, habitat requirements, and social structure are just a few of the important natural history traits that help an animal survive in the wild. Understanding them will promote healing, reduce stress and facilitate successful rehabilitation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Jennifer Mannas, PAWS Wildlife Center

Jennifer Mannas was a Wildlife Naturalist at the PAWS Wildlife Center. She holds a Master of Science degree in Fish and Wildlife Management from Montana State University based on her work studying the mass dynamics of the Weddell seal population in Antarctica.

References

American Zoo and Aquarium Association Behavior and Husbandry Advisory Group. 1999. Accessed September 2017. <https://www.aza.org/behavior–scientific-advisory–group>.

Arnold, S. J. 2003. Too Much Natural History, or Too Little? Animal Behaviour 65:1065–1068.

Bartholomew, G. A. 1986. The Role of Natural History in Contemporary Biology. BioScience 36(5): 324–329.

Bury, R. B. 2006. Natural History, Field Ecology, Conservation Biology and Wildlife Management: Time to Connect the Dots. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 1(1): 56–61.

Cox, M. 1998. What Is Wildlife Rehabilitation? The NWRA Quarterly, 16(2):16–18.

Dubois, S., and D. Fraser. 2003. Defining and Measuring Success in Wildlife Rehabilitation. Pp. 123–136 in Wildlife Rehabilitation, Vol 21 (Bea Orendorff, editor). National Wildlife Rehabilitators Association: St. Cloud, MN.

Duke, G. E., L. Frink, and E. Thrune. 1998. Why Wildlife Rehabilitation Is Significant. The NWRA Quarterly 16(4): 14–16.

Gulas–Wroblewski, B. E. 2007. The Importance of Enrichment in Wildlife Rehabilitation. Wildlife Rehabilitation Bulletin. 25(2): 25–31.

Herman, S. G. 2002. Wildlife Biology and Natural History: Time for a Reunion. The Journal of Wildlife Management. 66: 933–946.

McCallum, M. L., and J. L. McCallum. 2006. Publication Trends of Natural History and Field Studies in Herpetology. Herpetological Conservation and Biology. 1(1): 62–67.

Miller, E. A., editor. 2012. Minimum Standards for Wildlife Rehabilitation, 4th edition. National Wildlife Rehabilitators Association: St. Cloud, MN.

Schmidly, D. J. 2005. What It Means to Be a Naturalist and the Future of Natural History at American Universities. Journal of Mammalogy. 86(3): 449–456.