Length of stay in rehabilitation influences magnitude of the acute stress response in birds of prey

Authors

  • Naomi Klingbeil School of Biological and Environmental Studies, Millikin University, Decatur, IL, USA
  • Jacques T. Nuzzo llinois Raptor Center, Decatur, IL, USA
  • D. Jane Seitz llinois Raptor Center, Decatur, IL, USA
  • Beth Chan llinois Raptor Center, Decatur, IL, USA
  • Travis E. Wilcoxen llinois Raptor Center, Decatur, IL, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1279-5950

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53607/wrb.v42.274

Keywords:

rehabilitation, raptor, corticosterone, habituation, heterophil, lymphocyte

Abstract

Wild animals are occasionally injured or become ill as a result of natural causes
or human activity. As a way to remediate the damage imposed by humans on
wildlife populations, these animals may be taken in for rehabilitation. Federal
laws for rehabilitators set limits for the length of time a bird can remain in
rehabilitation before a final decision on release or euthanasia is made. Little is
known about the consequences of longer stays in captivity within that limited
window with regard to stress physiology of the animals. The authors hypothesised
that length of stay in rehabilitation would influence the ability of raptors
to mount a full stress response upon release from rehabilitation. Blood samples
were taken from each bird upon admission for rehabilitation and immediately
prior to their release, a process by which the animals are exposed to a significant,
acute stressor of capture, handling, and examination. A blood sample
was collected for analysis of heterophil to lymphocyte ratios (H:L), which
are indicative of long-term baseline stress. The authors found that as length of
stay increased, the difference in corticosterone levels reached during an acute
stressor from admission samples to release samples decreased. Baseline stress,
as indicated by H:L, was not significantly affected by length of stay. The results
suggest that birds of prey in rehabilitation habituate to captivity the longer
they stay in captivity and may lose some degree of natural responsiveness to
stressors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Black P.A., McRuer D.L. & Horne L. 2011. Hematologic

parameters in raptor species in a rehabilitation setting

before release. Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery 25(3),

–298, doi: 10.1647/2010-024.1.

Butler S.J., Whittingham M.J., Quinn J.L. & Cresswell W.

Time in captivity, individual differences and foraging

behavior in wild-caught chaffinches. Behaviour 143,

–548.

Campo J.L. & Davila S.G. 2002. Estimation of heritability

for heterophil:lymphocyte ratio in chickens by restricted

maximum likelihood. Effects of age, sex, and crossing.

Poultry Science 81, 1448–1453, doi: 10.1093/ps/81.10.1448.

Carroll G., Turner E., Dann P. & Harcourt R. 2016. Prior

exposure to capture heightens the corticosterone and

behavioural responses of little penguins (Eudyptula minor)

to acute stress. Conservation Physiology 4, doi: 10.1093/

conphys/cov061

Davis A.K. & Maerz J.C. 2011. Addressing stress levels of

captive-reared amphibians with hematological data: implications

for conservation initiatives. Journal of Herpetology

(1), 40–44, doi: 10.1670/10-180.1.

Davis A.K. & Maney D.L. 2018. The use of glucocorticoid

hormones or leucocyte profiles to measure stress in vertebrates:

what’s the difference? Methods in Ecology and

Evolution 9, 1556–1568, doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13020.

Dickens M.J., Earle K.L. & Romero L.M. 2008. Initial transference

of wild birds to captivity alters stress physiology.

General and Comparative Endocrinology, 160(1), 76–83, doi:

1016/j.ygcen.2008.10.023

Drummond H. & Ancona S. 2015. Observational field studies

reveal wild birds responding to early-life stresses with

resilience, plasticity, and intergenerational effects. The

Auk: Ornithological Advances 132, 563–576, doi: 10.1642/

AUK-14-244.1.

Dufty Jr. A.M. & Belthoff J.M. 1997. Corticosterone and the

stress response in young Western screech-owls: effects of

captivity, gender, and activity period. Physiological Zoology

(2), 143–149, doi: 10.1086/639564.

Giambelluca S., Cammarata M., Dara S., Orefice T., Camina-

Cardenal A. & Vazzana I. 2017. The impact of captivity on

some haematological parameters of griffon vultures (Gyps

fulvus). Veterinaria Italiana 53(3), 243–249, doi: 10.12834/

VetIt.743.3616.2.

Genovese K.J., He H., Swaggerty C.L. & Kogut M.H. 2013. The

avian heterophil. Developmental and Comparative Immunology

(3), 334–340, doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2013.03.021.

Goessling J.M., Kennedy H., Medonca M.T. & Wilson A.E.

A meta-analysis of plasma corticosterone and heterophil:

lymphocyte ratios – is there conservation of physiological

stress responses over time? Functional Ecology 29,

–1196, doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12442.

Granati G., Cichella F. & Lucidi P. 2021. High-tech training

for birds of prey. Animals 11, 530, doi: 10.3390/

ani11020530

Grasman K.A. 2002. Assessing immunological function in toxicological

studies of avian wildlife. Integrative & Comparative

Biology 42(1), 34–42, doi: 10.3390/ani11020530.

Guerra, R.R., Glenison, F.D., Bernadino, M.G.S., Nailson Jr,

A.N., Monalisa, F.V.F. & Guerra, F.S. 2018. Hematological

standards, hormonal indexes and gonadal morphology

of Roadside Hawks (Rupornis magnirostris). Archives of

Veterinary Science 23, 63–76, doi: 10.5380/avs.v23i1.58580

Heidinger B.J., Nisbet I.C.T. & Ketterson E.D. 2008. Changes

in adrenal capacity contribute to a decline in the stress

response with age in a long-lived seabird. General and

Comparative Endocrinology 156, 564–568, doi: 10.1016/j.

ygcen.2008.02.014.

Herman J.P., McKlveen J.M., Ghosal S., Kopp B., Wulsin A.,

Makinson R., Scheimann J. &Myers B. 2016. Regulation of

the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical stress response.

Comparative Physiology 6(2), 603–621, doi: 10.1002/cphy.

c150015.

Hing S., Narayan E.J., Thompson R.C.A. & Godfrey S.S. 2016.

The relationship between physiological stress and wildlife

disease: consequences for health and conservation. Wildlife

Research 43(1), 51–60, doi: 10.1071/WR15183.

IBM Corp. 2017. SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25.0.

Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.

Kluen E., Ronka K. & Thorogood R. 2022. Prior experience

of captivity affects behavioural responses to ‘novel’ environments.

PeerJ 10, e13905, doi: 10.7717/peerj.13905

Laurence A., Houdelier C., Calandreau L., Arnould C.,

Favreau-Peigne A., Leterrier C., Boissy A. & Lumineau

S. 2015. Environmental enrichment reduces behavioural

alterations induced by chronic stress in Japanese quail.

Animal 9(2), 331–338, doi: 10.1017/S1751731114002523.

Love O.P., Shutt L.J., Silfies J.S. & Bird D.M. 2003. Repeated

restraint and sampling results in reduced corticosterone

levels in developing and adult captive American Kestrels

(Falco sparverius). Physiological and Biochemical Zoology:

Ecological and Evolutionary Approaches 76(5), 753–761, doi:

1086/376431.

Mason G.J. 2010. Species differences in response to captivity:

stress, welfare, and the comparative method. Trends

in Ecology and Evolution 25(12), 713–721, doi: 10.1016/j.

tree.2010.08.011.

Mellor D.J. & Beausoleil N.J. 2015. Extending the “Five

Domains” model for animal welfare assessment to incorporate

positive welfare states. Animal Welfare 24, 241–253,

doi: 10.7120/09627286.24.3.241.

Mellor D.J., Beausoleil N.J., Littlewood K.E., McLean A.N.,

McGreevy P.D., Jones B. & Wilkins C. 2020. The 2020 five

domains model: including human-animal interactions

in assessments of animal welfare. Animals 10, 1870, doi:

3390/ani10101870.

Miller, E.A. (ed.) 2012. Minimum standards for wildlife rehabilitation.

St. Cloud, MN: National Wildlife Rehabilitators

Association. 116 p.

Miller E.A. & Schlieps, J. (ed.) 2021. Standards for wildlife

rehabilitation. Bloomington, MN: National Wildlife

Rehabilitators Association. 419 p.

Müller C., Jenni-Elermann S. & Jenni L. 2011. Heterophils/

lymphocytes-ratio and circulating corticosterone do

not indicate the same stress imposed on Eurasian kestrel

nestlings. Functional Ecology 25(3), 566–576, doi:

1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01816.x.

Pakkala J.J., Norris D.R. & Newman A.E.M. 2013. An experimental

test of the capture-restraint protocol for estimating

the acute stress response. Physiological and Biochemical

Zoology 86(2), 279–284, doi: 10.1086/668893.

Potts A. 2016. Captive enrichment for owls (Strigiformes).

Journal of Wildlife Rehabilitation 36(2), 11–29.

Pravosudov V.V. 2005. Corticosterone and memory in birds.

In A. Dawson & P. Sharp (eds.): Functional avian endocrinology.

Pp. 257–269. New Delhi: Narosa Publishing House.

Rich E.L. & Romero L.M. 2005. Exposure to chronic stress

downregulates corticosterone responses to acute stressors.

American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative, and

Comparative Physiology 288, R1628–R1634, doi: 10.1152/

ajpregu.00484.2004.

Sapolsky R.M., Romero L.M. & Munck A.U. 2000. How do

glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive,

suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions.

Endocrine Reviews 21, 55–89, doi: 10.1210/edrv.21.1.0389.

Scheun J., Ludynia K., Snyman A. & Ganswindt A. 2021.

Non-invasive hormone monitoring as a robust method

for determining adrenocortical activity in injured, emaciated

and oil-contaminated African penguins undergoing

rehabilitation. General and Comparative Endocrinology 303,

, doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2020.113703

Schoenle L.A., Zimmer C. & Vitousek M.N. 2018.

Understanding context dependence in glucocorticoid-fitness

relationships: the role of the nature of the challenge,

the intensity, and frequence of stressors, and life

history. Integrative and Comparative Biology 58, 777–789, doi:

1093/icb/icy046.

Straub J., Forbes N., Pees M. & Krautwald-Junghanns

M.-E. 2003. Effect of handling-induced stress on the

results of spectral Doppler electrocardiography in falcons.

Research in Veterinary Science 74, 119–122, doi: 10.1016/

s0034-5288(02)00159-5.

Tome M.E., McNabb F.M.A. & Gwazdauskas F.C. 1985.

Adrenal responses to chronic and acute water stress in

Japanese quail Coturnix japonica. Comparative Biochemistry

and Physiology Part A: Physiology 81(1), 171–179, doi:

1016/0300-9629(85)90284-1.

Wilcoxen T.E., Boughton R.K., Bridge E.S., Rensel M.A. &

Schoech S.J. 2011. Age-related differences in baseline and

stress-induced corticosterone in Florida scrub-jays. General

and Comparative Endocrinology 173, 461–466, doi: 10.1016/j.

ygcen.2011.07.007.

Wilcoxen T.E., Horn D.J., Hubble C.N., Huber S.J., Flamm

J., Knott M., Lundstrom L., Salik F., Wassenhove S.J. &

Wrobel E.R. 2015. Effects of bird feeding activities on the

health of wild birds. Conservation Physiology 3, doi: 10.1093/

conphys/cov058.

Willette M., Rosenhagen N., Buhl G., Innis C. & Boehm J.

Interrupted lives: welfare considerations in wildlife

rehabilitation. Animals 13, 1836, doi: 10.3390/ani13111836

Wingfield J.C. 2003. Control of behavioural strategies for

capricious environments. Animal Behaviour 66, 807–816,

doi: 10.1006/anbe.2003.2298.

Published

2024-12-13

How to Cite

Klingbeil, N., Nuzzo, J. T., Seitz, D. J., Chan, B., & Wilcoxen, T. E. (2024). Length of stay in rehabilitation influences magnitude of the acute stress response in birds of prey. Wildlife Rehabilitation Bulletin, 42(2), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.53607/wrb.v42.274

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Categories