Ethical considerations in wildlife medicine


  • LoraKim Joyner One Earth Conservation



Ethics, communication, veterinary ethics, wildlife medicine, nonviolent communication, conservation psychology, conservation behavior, animal welfare, utilitarianism


Component wildlife ethics includes two aspects: an understanding of ethical principles and skills in ethical deliberation. Ethical principles reviewed here include utilitarianism, deontological ethics, environmentalism or respect for nature, virtue ethics, relational ethics, care ethics and reverence for life ethics. Other processes and tools that take into account human sociology, behaviour and subconscious functioning in moral decision-making include conservation psychology, narrative ethics, socioscience, listening and communication skills, and needs-based ethics. We also take into account non-human functioning such as welfare science, conservation behaviour and cognitive ethology. Incorporating these tools and instituting ethical practices and programs within our wildlife and conservation management plans and organizations improve our ability to care for ourselves, other humans, wildlife and ecosystems.


Blumstein, D.T., and E. Fernandez-Juricic. 2010. A Primer of Conservation Behavior. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.

Bolte J. 2006. My stroke of insight: a brain scientists’ personal journey. New York, NY: Viking.

Briscoe, J. and L. Joyner. 2008. The Companion Avian Manifesto: A Review of the Value of Birds as Our Pets and Patients. In Proc Annu Conf of the Association of Avian Veterinarians, 143–151. Teaneck, NJ, USA: Association of Avian Veterinarians.

Catalano A., Lyons-White J., Mills M. & Knight A. 2019. Learning from published project failures in conservation. Biological Conservation 238. Accessed on the internet at on 10 January 2020.

Clayton S. & Myers G. 2009. Conservation psychology: understanding and promoting human care for nature. West Sussex, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

Dunayer J. 2004. Speciesism. Herdon, VA: Lantern Books.

Fraser D. 2008. Understanding animal welfare: the science in its cultural context (UFAW Animal Welfare). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.

Goleman D. 2006. Social intelligence: the new science of human relationships. New York, NY: Bantam Books.

Hunn E.S. 2010. Forward. In S. Tidemann & A. Gosler (eds.): Ethno-ornithology: birds, indigenous peoples, cultures, and society. Pp. xi–xii. London, UK: Earthscan.

Levine E.D. Mills D. & Houpt K. 2005. Attitudes of veterinary students at one US college toward factors relating to farm animal welfare. JVME 32(4), 481–490. doi: 10.3138/jvme.32.4.481

Manfredo M.J. 2008. Who cares about wildlife? Social science concepts for understanding human-wildlife relationships and other conservation issues. New York, NY: Springer Press.

Manfredo, M.J. Teel T. & Zinn H. 2009. Understanding global values toward wildlife. In Wildlife and society. The science of human dimensions. Pp. 31–43. Washington, DC: Island Press.

McCarthy J. 2003. Principalism or narrative ethics: must we choose between them? Med Humanities 29, 65–71. doi: 10.1136/mh.29.2.65

Mellor D.J., Beausoleil N.J., Littlewood K.E., McLean A.N., McGreevy P.D., Jones, B. & Wilkins, C. 2020. The 2020 five domains model: including human–animal interactions in assessments of animal welfare. Animals 10, 1870. doi: 10.3390/ani10101870

Mendi M. & Paul E.S. 2004. Consciousness, emotion, and animal welfare: insights from cognitive science. Animal Welfare 13, S17–S25.

Regan T. 2004. The case for animal rights. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.

Rosenberg M. 2003. Nonviolent communication: the language of life. Encinitas, CA: Puddledancer Press.

Rubio-Espinosa, M. 2010. El capital social como herramienta de conservación communitarian de los recurosos naturales in Oaxaca, Mexico. Mesoamericana 2, 114.

Sandhoe, P. & Christiansen, S.B. 2008. Ethics of animal use. West Sussex, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

Tinbergen, N. 1963. On aims and methods in ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 20, 410–433. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1963.tb01161.x

Turner J. 2000. On the origins of human emotions: a sociological inquiry into the evolution of human affect. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Turner J.H. 2002. Face to face: toward a sociological theory of interpersonal behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Wilson, E.O. 1984. Biophilia: The Human Bond with Other Species. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Zeidler D. L. et al. 2005. Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377.

Zeidler D. L. et al. 2007. The role of moral reasoning in argumentation: conscience, character, and care. Pp 196–211 in Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom Based Research (Erduran S. and M.R. Jimenez-Alexander eds). Springer Press, New York, NY.

Recommended Reading

Bekoff M., Allen C. & Burghardt G.M. (eds.). 2002. The cognitive animal: empirical and theoretical perspectives on animal cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Dukas, R. & Ratcliffe, J.M. (eds.). 2009. Cognitive ecology II. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Milani, M.M. 1995. The art of veterinary practice: a guide to client communication. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Norton B.G., Hutchins M., Stevens E.F. & Maple T.L. 1995. Ethics on the ark: zoos, animal welfare and wildlife. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.

Rollins, B. 2006a. Animal rights and human morality. 3rd ed. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.

Rollins B. 2006b. An introduction to veterinary medical ethics: theory and cases. 2nd ed. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.

Tannenbaum J. Veterinary ethics: Animal welfare, client relations, competition and collegiality. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

Waldau P. & Patto K (eds.) 2006. A communion of subjects: Animals in religion, science, and ethics. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Wilson, E.O. 1984. Biophilia: The human bond with other species. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.



How to Cite

Joyner, L. (2022). Ethical considerations in wildlife medicine. Wildlife Rehabilitation Bulletin, 39(1), 36-46.



Original Articles