Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) Feathers as an Alternative to Blood for Microsatellite DNA Analysis: Toward a Non–invasive Technique for Conservation Genetics

Sarah Courchesne; Dawn Meola; Acacia Alcivar–Warren

doi:10.53607/wrb.v23.213

Authors

Sarah Courchesne Tufts Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine
Dawn Meola Tufts Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine
Acacia Alcivar–Warren Tufts Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53607/wrb.v23.213

Keywords:

Conservation genetics, microsatellites, blood, feather, bald eagle, DNA, Haliaeetus leucocephalus

Abstract

The bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) is currently classified as threatened in the lower 48 United States. In Massachusetts, only 12 active nesting sites presently exist, and the majority of breeding birds originated from a population of eaglets imported from Nova Scotia in the 1980s. Previous work using Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) technique demonstrated a genetic diversity among Massachusetts’s eagles of only 22 percent. RAPD, while useful for genetic analysis of blood samples, proved to be inappropriate for analysis of feather samples from the same birds. To address this, our current work aimed at determining whether microsatellites would yield identical information for blood and feather samples from the same animal. Utilizing GenBank sequences, a total of 24 microsatellite primer sets representing 18 loci were designed and tested for allele polymorphism using DNA from eight blood samples and a single annealing temperature in the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Thirteen microsatellites (54%) representing 11 loci were polymorphic, and three of these were selected to compare allele sizes in blood and feather DNA from the same eaglet. Preliminary results using microsatellite AJ620425 showed that 18 out of 44 blood/feather pairs amplified alleles of similar sizes. Feather DNA of the other 26 blood/feather pairs tested did not amplify any alleles. Data suggest that microsatellite alleles from blood and feather of the same bird may be consistent, and the microsatellite technique could be useful for non–invasive conservation genetics studies. However, multiple repetitions of the experiment are needed in order to determine optimum DNA concentration for feather samples. Additionally, refinements to the protocol will be necessary to obtain greater amplification of feather DNA which tended to give somewhat weak signals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sarah Courchesne, Tufts Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine

Sarah Courchesne is currently a second year student at Tufts Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine. She hopes to pursue a career in pathology after her graduation.

Dawn Meola, Tufts Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine

Dawn Meola received her BS in marine biology from the University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth. She is Senior Research Technician in the lab of Dr. Acacia Alcivar-Warren.

Acacia Alcivar–Warren, Tufts Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine

Acacia Alcivar–Warren is an Associate Professor at Tufts Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine and director of the International Marine Shrimp Environmental Genomics Initiative (IMSEGI): Monitoring Ecosystem, Animal, and Public Health.

References

Alcivar, A. A., L. E. Hake, C. F. Millette, J. M. Trasler, and N. B. Hecht. 1989. Mitochondrial gene expression in male germ cells of the mouse. Developmental Biology. 135:263–271.

Alcivar–Warren, A., C. Bell, C. Mark, A. Dhar, D. Davis, and M. Pokras. 2003. Bald eagle genomics. Paper presented at the Plant and Animal Genome XI conference, San Diego, CA, January 2003.

Alpers, D. L., B. J. Van Vuuren, P. Arctander, and T. J. Robinson. 2004. Population genetics of the roan antelope (Hippotragus equinus) with suggestions for conservation. Molecular Ecology. 13:1771–1784.

Bayliss, C. D., K. M. Dixon, and E. R. Moxon. 2004. Simple sequence repeats (microsatellites): mutational mechanisms and contributions to bacterial pathogenesis. A meeting review. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology. (40)1:11–19.

Booth, W. 2000. How to Protect Habitat? Bald Eagle’s Removal From Endangered List Delayed. Washington Post. July 4, 2000.

Culver, M, R. E. Tingay, D. A. Dawson, V. David, I. R. Barr, M. L. Clarke, and S. J. O’Brien. 2004. Characterization of bald eagle, Haliaeetus leucocephalus microsatellite loci and their cross–species utility in the African Fish Eagle, Haliaeetus vocifer and the Madagascar Fish Eagle, Haliaeetus vociferoides. Unpublished. Available from: < http://www.ncbi.Nih.Gov/Genbank/ >.

DeGraaf, R. M., and M. Yamasaki. 2001. New England Wildlife. University Press of New England: Hanover, NH. Federal Register: Proposed Rules, Federal Register 64, no. 128 (6 July 1999):36453–36464. Available from: <http://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/index.html >.

Haymer, D. 1994. Random Amplified Polymorphic DNAs and microsatellites: what are they, and can they tell us anything we don’t already know? Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 87:717–722.

Khatib, H, E. Genislav, L. B. Crittenden, N. Bumstead, and M. Soller. 1993. Sequence–tagged microsatellite sites as markers in chicken reference and resource populations. Animal Genetics. 5:355–362.

Lesica, P., and F. W. Allendorf. 1994. When are Peripheral Populations Valuable for Conservation? Conservation Biology. 9:753–760.

Li, Y. C., A. B. Korol, T. Fahima, and E. Nevo. 2004. Microsatellites within genes: structure, function and evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 6:991–1007.

Longmire, J. L., D. C. Hahn, and J. L. Roach. 1999. Low abundance of microsatellite repeats in the genome of the brown–headed cowbird (Molothrus ater). Journal of Heredity. 5:574–578.

Mark, C., A. K. Dhar, D. Davis, M. Pokras, and A. Alcivar–Warren. 2003. Low levels of genetic diversity in the threatened bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) population from Massachusetts. Paper presented at the Conservation Genetics Conference of the American Genetic Association, Front Royal, VA, September 2003.

Meehan, D., Z. Xu, G. Zuniga, and A. Alcivar–Warren. 2003. High frequency and large number of polymorphic microsatellites in cultured shrimp, Penaeus (Litopenaeus) vannamei [Crustacea: Decapoda]. Marine Biotechnology. 5:311–330.

Nei, M. 1987. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Pp. 176–207. Columbia University Press: New York, NY.

Pemberton, J. M., J. Slate, D. R. Bancroft, and J. A. Barrett. 1994. Nonamplifying alleles at microsatellite loci: a caution for parentage and population studies. Molecular Ecology. 4:249–252.

Public law: Bald Eagle Protection Act of 1940, 16 U.S.C. 668–668d, 54 Stat. 250 (June 8, 1940; amended 1959, 1962, 1972, and 1978). Available from: <http://www.gpoaccess.gov/uscode/ >.

Primmer, C. R., T. Raudsepp, B. P. Chowdhary, A. P. Moller, and H. Ellegren. 1997. Low frequency of microsatellites in the avian genome. Genome Research. 7:471–482.

Rozen, S., and H. J. Skaletsky. 1996, 1997. Primer3 Software. Available from: <http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/primer3/primer3_code.html >.

Segelbacher, G., and I. Storch. 2002. Capercaillie in the Alps: genetic evidence of metapopulation structure and population decline. Molecular Ecology. 11:1669–1677.

Xu, Z., A. K. Dhar, J. Wyrzykowski, and A. Alcivar–Warren. 1999. Identification of abundant and informative microsatellites from shrimp (Penaeus monodon) genome. Animal Genetics. 30:1–7.