Survival of rehabilitated and released red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis)

Jacqueline E. Sandberg; Timothy R. Van deelen; Mark E. Berres

doi:10.53607/wrb.v38.177

Authors

Jacqueline E. Sandberg Dane County Humane Society's Wildlife Center, Madison WI
Timothy R. Van deelen UW-Madison Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology
Mark E. Berres UW-Madison Department of Genetics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53607/wrb.v38.177

Abstract

Wildlife rehabilitation provides responsible care for sick, injured or orphaned wild animals with the goal of releasing fully recovered individuals back into the environment. Post-release survival data for these animals remain sparse but necessary to measure and assess the impact of wildlife rehabilitation as a conservation strategy. This study used national banding data to quantitatively compare annual survival of wild-caught (non-rehabilitated) and rehabilitated red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis). In addition, 13 rehabilitated and released red-tailed hawks from Dane County Humane Society’s Wildlife Center (DCHS, Madison, WI) were monitored using radio telemetry. Annual survival of rehabilitated and radio-tagged red-tailed hawks from DCHS was 36% over 85 weeks of monitoring. Nationally, wild red-tailed hawk annual survival (0.777; 95% CI [0.768, 0.777]) was largely equivalent to estimates reported in other published studies. These estimates reflect average survival over 40 years in a fully time-dependent model (variance component estimated using the Delta Method; Powell 2007). Rehabilitated red-tailed hawks had an annual survival of 0.549 (95% CI: 0.523, 0.575]) over 43 years. These values reflect model-averaged estimates from time-independent survival models (recovery was time dependent) that were equivalent in terms of likelihood (Brownie = Seber = w_i = 0.50). Consequently, survival of rehabilitated red-tailed hawks was approximately 22% lower than wild-caught individuals. Furthermore, young (hatch-year) red-tailed hawks experienced increased mortality (34%) relative to those rehabilitated as adults (0.255; 95% CI [0.199, 0.321] versus 0.598; 95% CI [0.571, 0.624], respectfully). The results of this study demonstrate the need for additional post-release monitoring and may guide future management decisions regarding wildlife rehabilitative criteria, practice and viability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amaral F.R., Sheldon F.H., Gamauf A., Haring E., Riesing M., Silveira L.F. & Wajntal A. 2009. Patterns and processes of diversification in a widespread and ecologically diverse avian group, the buteonine hawks (Aves, Accipitridae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 53(3), 703–715, doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.07.020.

Battistone C. 2012. Ecology of red-tailed hawks in California in red-tailed hawks species account. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Fish and Game. Appendix F, pp. 1–17.

Bednarz J.C. & James J.D. 1982. Nest-Sites and Habitat of Red-Shouldered and Red-Tailed Hawks in Iowa. The Wilson Bulletin, 94(1), 31–45, doi: 10.31274/rtd-180813-7490

Bildstein K.L. & Peterjohn B.G. 2012. The future of banding in raptor science. Journal of Raptor Research, 46(1), 3–11, doi: 10.3356/JRR-10-110.1.

Bloom P.H. 2011. Vagrancy, natal dispersal and migrations of red-tailed and red-shouldered hawks banded in the pacific flyway. Ph.D. dissertation. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho.

Bloom P.H., Scott J.M., Papp J.M., Thomas S.E. & Kidd J.W. 2011. Vagrant western red-shouldered hawks: origins, natal dispersal patterns, and survival. The Condor, 113(3), 538–546, doi: 10.1525/cond.2011.100052.

Bobowski M.M. 2013. The foraging behaviors and decision making strategies of over-wintering red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis) and American kestrels (Falco sparverius) in relations to prey density and patch site characteristics in Northeastern Arkansas. M.S. thesis. Jonesboro, AK: Arkansas State University.

Briggs C.W. 2007. Survival and nesting ecology of the Swainson’s hawk in Butte Valley, CA. M.S. thesis. Reno, NV: University of Nevada Reno.

Brownie C., Anderson D.R., Burnham K.P. & Robson D.S. 1985. Statistical inference from band recovery data: a handbook. 2nd edition. Resource publication 156. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife.

Brownie C., Hines J.E. & Nichols J.D. 1986. Constant parameter capture-recapture models. Biometrics, 42, 561–574, doi: 10.2307/2531206.

Buderman F.E., Diefenbach D.R., Casalena M.J., Rosenberry C.S. & Wallingford B.D. 2014. Accounting for tagging-to-harvest mortality in a Brownie tag-recovery model by incorporating radio-telemetry data. Ecology and Evolution, 4(8), 1439–1450, doi: 10.1002/ece3.1025.

Cherkassky L.M. 2011. Anthropogenic causes of wild bird mortality. Wildlife Rehabilitation Bulletin, 29(1), 1–11.

Cooch E. & White G. 2012. A gentle introduction to Program Mark. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University.

Donohue K.C. & Dufty A.M. 2006. Sex determination of red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis calurus) using DNA analysis and morphometrics. Journal of Field Ornithology, 77(1), 74–79, doi: 10.1111/j.1557-9263.2006.00003.x.

Duke G.E., Redig P.T. & Jones W. 1981. Recoveries and resightings of released rehabilitated birds of prey. Journal of Raptor Research, 15(4), 97–107.

Edmunds, J. 2016. Home Range and Survival of Rehabilitated and Released Red-tailed Hawks (Buteo jamaicensis). M.S. thesis. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Fajardo I., Babiloni G. & Miranda Y. 2000. Rehabilitated and wild barn owls (Tyto alba): dispersal, life expectancy and mortality in Spain. Biological Conservation, 94, 287–295, doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00003-3.

Fitch H.S., Swenson F. & Tillotson D. 1946. Behavior and food habits of the Red-tailed Hawk. The Condor, 48(5), 205–237, doi: 10.2307/1363939

Fridolfsson A.K. & Ellegren H. 1999. A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds. Journal of Avian Biology, 30, 116–121, doi: 10.2307/3677252.

Gates J.M. 1972. Red-tailed Hawks populations and ecology in East-Central Wisconsin. The Wilson Bulletin, 84(4), 421–433.

Griffin, C.R. 1985. Biology of the Hawaiian hawk (Buteos olitatius). Dissertation. University of Missouri, Columbia, USA.

Hamilton L.L., Zwank P.J. & Olsen G.H. 1988. Movements and survival of released rehabilitated hawks. Journal of Raptor Research, 22(1), 22–26.

Heintzelman D.S. 2004. Hawks and owls of Eastern North America. Rutgers University Press.

Henny C.J. & Wight H.M. 1970. Population ecology and environmental pollution: red-tailed and Cooper’s hawks. In Population ecology of migratory birds: a symposium. Pp. 229–249. Patuxent Wildlife Research Center.

Henny C.J. & Wight H.M. 1972. Population ecology and environmental pollution: Red-tailed and Cooper’s hawks. In Population ecology of migratory birds: a symposium. Pp. 229–250. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior Wildlife, Bureau of Sports Fisheries and Wildlife Research, Rep. 2.

Jackson A.M. 2011. Survival estimates of white-tailed deer fawns at Fort Rucker, Alabama. M.S. thesis. Auburn, AL: Auburn University.

Johnson D.H. 1974. Estimating survival rates from banding of adult and juvenile birds. USGS Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center. Paper 208. Accessed on the internet at http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsnpwrc/208 on 3 April 2015

Johnson, S.J. 1975. Productivity of the red-tailed hawk in southwestern Montana. Auk, 92, 732–736, doi: 10.2307/4084784

Joosten S. & Moore, A. (eds.) 2004. Principles of wildlife rehabilitation. 2nd edition. St. Cloud, MN: National Wildlife Rehabilitators Association.

Kenward R.E. 2001. A manual for wildlife radio tagging. London: Academic Press.

Kerlinger P. 2005. Survivor? Birder’s World, 19(6), 58.

Krüger, O. & Lindstrŏm J. 2001. Lifetime reproductive success in common buzzard (Buteo buteo): from individual variation to population demography. Oikos, 93(2), 260–273, doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.930209.x

Lebreton J., Burnham K.P., Clobert J. & Anderson D.R. 1992. Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals; a unified approach with case studies. Ecological Monographs, 62(1), 67–118, doi: 10.2307/2937171.

Lenth R.V. 1981. Robust measures of location for directional data. Technometrics, 23(1), 77–81, doi: 10.1080/00401706.1981.10486240.

Luttich S.N., Keith L.B. & Stephenson J.D. 1971. Population dynamics of the red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis) at Rochester, Alberta. The Auk, 88, 75–87, doi: 10.2307/4083962.

Martell M.S., Redig P., Nibe J. & Buhl G. 1991. Survival and movements of released rehabilitated bald eagles. Journal of Raptor Research, 25(3), 72–76.

Martell M.S., Goggin J. & Redig P.T. 2000. Assessing rehabilitation success of birds of prey through band returns. In Raptor biomedicine III. Pp. 327–334. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Miller E.A. (ed.) 2012. Minimum standards for wildlife rehabilitation. 4th edition. St. Cloud, MN: National Wildlife Rehabilitators Association. 116 pages

Molina-López R.A., Casal J. & Darwich L. 2011. Causes of morbidity in wild raptor populations admitted at a wildlife rehabilitation centre in Spain from 1995–2007: a long term retrospective study. PLoS One, 6(9), e24603, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024603.

Morishita T.Y., Fullerton A.T., Lowenstine L.J., Gardner I.A. & Brooks D.L. 1998. Morbidity and mortality in free-living raptorial birds of Northern California: a retrospective study, 1983–1994. Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery, 12(2), 78–81.

Nasution M.D., Brownie C., Pollock K. & Bennets R.E. 2001. Estimating survival from joint analysis of resighting and radiotelemetry capture recapture data for wild animals. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 6(4), 461–478, doi: 10.1198/10857110152946839.

Newton I. 1979. Population ecology of birds of prey. Vermillion, SD: Buteo Books.

Parrish J.D., Braun D.P. & Unnasch R.S. 2003. Are we conserving what we say we are? Measuring ecological integrity within protected areas. BioScience, 53(9), 851–860, doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0851:AWCWWS]2.0.CO;2.

Perrins C.M. & Birkhead T.R. 1983. Avian ecology. Glasgow: Blackie and Son Ltd. Distributed in USA by Chapman and Hall New York.

Pollock K.H., Winterstein S.R., Bunck C.M. & Curtis P.D. 1989. Survival analysis in telemetry studies: the staggered entry design. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 53(1), 7–15, doi: 10.2307/3801296.

Powell L.A. 2007. Approximating variance of demographic parameters using the delta method: a reference for avian biologists. The Condor, 109(4), 949–954, doi: 10.1093/condor/109.4.949.

Punch P.I.P. 2001. A retrospective study of the success of medical and surgical treatment of wild Australian birds of prey. Australian Veterinary Journal, 79(11), 747–752, doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2001.tb10890.x.

Reed E.T. 1976. Is your banding of any value? North American bird bander, 1(4), 178–179.

Schoenebeck C.W., Turco M., Fahrlander, R.M., Darveau, K.M. & Freeman T.L. 2014. Sex and age group specific changes in body condition of red-tailed Hawks in central Nebraska. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 126(3), 575–580, doi: 10.1676/13-131.1.

Seber G.A.F. 1970. Estimating time-specific survival and reporting rates for adult birds from band returns. Biometrika, 57(2), 313–318, doi: 10.1093/biomet/57.2.313.

Sullivan J. 1995. Bubo virginianus in: fire effects information system. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. Accessed on the internet at http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Tristan T. 2010. The aging raptor. Veterinary Clinics of North America. Exotic Animal Practice, 13(1), 51–84, doi: 10.1016/j.cvex.2009.10.001.

USGS Bird Banding Laboratory. 2013. North American bird banding and band encounter data set. [Unpublished data file created and retrieved on 10/22/2013 and 11/19/2013]. Laurel, MD: Patuxent Wildlife Research Center.

White G.C. & Burnham K.P. 1999. Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study Supplement, 46, 120–138, doi: 10.1080/00063659909477239.

White G.C., Burnham K.P. & D.R. Anderson. 2001. Advanced features of Program Mark. In R. Field, R.J. Warren, H. Okarma & P.R. Sievert (eds.): Wildlife, land, and people: priorities for the 21st century. Proceedings of the Second International Wildlife Management Congress, 368–377, Bethesda, MD: The Wildlife Society.

Woffinden, N.D. & Murphy, J.R. (1989). Decline of a Ferruginous Hawk Population: A 20-Year Summary. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 53(4), 1127–1132, doi: 10.2307/3809619