Reasons why animals are admitted to wildlife rehabilitation centers in Canada

Authors

  • Sherri Cox University of Guelph, Guelph; and Wildlife Veterinarian and Medical Director, The National Wildlife Centre, Caledon, Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53607/wrb.v39.173

Keywords:

wildlife rehabilitation, wildlife, rehabilitation, injured wildlife, anthropogenic

Abstract

A retrospective analysis was performed using more than 21 000 patient records from three large centers across Canada in order to determine the reasons for the presentation and outcome of wildlife brought into wildlife rehabilitation centers in Canada. Results suggest that up to 97% of wild animals brought into wildlife rehabilitation centers are thought to be directly or indirectly linked to anthropogenic causes. Trauma was the leading reason recorded for 61% of all cases admitted to wildlife rehabilitation centers. Orphaned wildlife was also a key reason why animals were admitted to wildlife rehabilitation centers in Canada. This research will help wildlife rehabilitators and agencies be aware of the reasons for animal admission to rehabilitation centers and provide opportunities to develop mitigation strategies to potentially minimize human impact on indigenous wildlife.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barham P., Crawford R., Underhill L., Wolfaardt A., Barham B., Dyer B.M., Leshoro T., Meyer M.A., Navarro R.A., Oschadleus D., Upfold L., Whittington P.A. & Williams A.J. 2006. Return to Robben Island of African penguins that were rehabilitated, relocated, or reared in captivity following the Treasure oil spill of 2000. Ostrich 77, 202–209. Accessed on the internet at http://www.adu.uct.ac.za/sites/default/files/image_tool/images/352/Staff/Dr_Rene_A_Navarro/145.pdf on 16 December 2020

Berg C. 2003. Best practices for migratory bird care during oil spill response. Anchorage, AK: US Fish and Wildlife Service. Accessed on the internet at https://www.fws.gov/wafwo/publications/best_practices.pdf on 16 December 2020

Bishop C.A. & Brogan J.M. 2013. Estimates of avian mortality attributed to vehicle collisions in Canada. Avian Conservation and Ecology 8(2), 2, doi: 10.5751/ACE-00604-080202.

Bourque L., Bollinger T., Nielsen O., Lockerbie B., Cox S., Khodadad J., Swinimer H., Roger L. & Jones M. 2019. Isolation and characterization of skunk adenovirus causing severe bronchointerstitial pneumonia in rehabilitated porcupines in Nova Scotia, Canada. Poster Presentation from the 68th Annual Wildlife Disease Association International Conference. 4–9 August, Tahoe City, CA. Accessed on the internet at https://wda2019.ucdavis.edu/sites/g/files/dgvnsk4756/files/files/page/WDA_2019_Detailed_Program.pdf on 16 December 2020

Cox S.L., Campbell G.D. & Nemeth N.M. 2015. Outbreaks of West Nile virus in captive waterfowl in Ontario, Canada. Avian Pathology 44(2), 135–141, doi: 10.1080/03079457.2015.1011604.

Erickson W.P., Johnson G.D. & Young Jr., D.P. 2005. A summary and comparison of bird mortality from anthropogenic causes with an emphasis on collisions. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report 191, 1029–1042.

Haxton T. 2000. Road mortality of snapping turtles, Chelydra serpentina, in Central Ontario during their nesting period. Canadian Field Naturalist 114(1), 106–110. Accessed on the internet at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281735547_Road_mortality_of_Snapping_Turtles_Chelydra_serpentina_in_central_Ontario_during_their_nesting_period on 16 December 2020

Longcore T., Rich C. & Sullivan L.M. 2009. Critical assessment of claims regarding management of feral cats by trap-neuter-return. Conservation Biology 23(4), 887–894, doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01174.x.

Loss S., Will T. & Marra P. 2013. The impact of free-ranging domestic cats on wildlife of the United States. Nature Communications 4, 1396, doi: 10.1038/ncomms2380.

Machtans C.S., Wedeles C.H.R. & Bayne E.M. 2013. A first estimate for Canada of the number of birds killed by colliding with building windows. Avian Conservation and Ecology 8(2), 6, doi: 10.5751/ACE-00568-080206.

Miller E.A. (ed.). 2012. Minimum standards for wildlife rehabilitation. 4th ed. St. Cloud, MN: National Wildlife Rehabilitators Association.

Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. 2020. Study guide for the Ontario wildlife rehabilitation exam. Accessed on the internet at https://files.ontario.ca/mnrf-study-guide-en-28-01-2020.pdf on 16 December 2020

Ontario Road Ecology Group. 2010. A guide to road ecology in Ontario. Accessed on the internet at https://www.rom.on.ca/sites/default/files/imce/oreg_final.pdf on 16 December 2020

Rioux S., Savard J.L. & Gerick A. 2013. Avian mortalities due to transmission line collisions: a review of current and estimates and field methods with an emphasis on applications to the Canadian electric network. Avian Conservation and Ecology 8(2), 7, doi: 10.5751/ACE-00614-080207.

Russell R.E. 2014. Causes of mortality in eagles submitted to the National Wildlife Research Center 1975–2013. Wildlife Society Bulletin 38(4), 697–704, doi: 10.1002/wsb.469.

Traffic Injury Research Foundation. 2012. Wildlife-vehicle collisions in Canada: a review of the literature and compendium of existing data sources. TIRF. Accessed on the internet at http://tirf.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/WildlifeVehicle_Collision_Deliverable1_Eng_6.pdf on 16 December 2020

Wildlife Collision Prevention Program. 2016. Annual report 2015/2016. Accessed on the internet at https://www.wildlifecollisions.ca/docs/wcpp_anualreport_15-16final.pdf on 16 December 2020

Zimmerling J.R., Pomero A.C., d’Entremont M.V. & Francis C.M. 2013. Canadian estimate of bird mortality due to collisions and direct habitat loss associated with wind turbine developments. Avian Conservation and Ecology 8(2), 10, doi: 10.5751/ACE-00609-080210.

Published

2022-07-14

How to Cite

Cox, S. (2022). Reasons why animals are admitted to wildlife rehabilitation centers in Canada. Wildlife Rehabilitation Bulletin, 39(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.53607/wrb.v39.173

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Categories