Salmonellosis in Wildlife: Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment Options for the Zoo Veterinary Technician and Wildlife Rehabilitator

Authors

  • Michelle H. Brown BS, MS Front Range Community College, Fort Collins, Colorado

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53607/wrb.v25.166

Keywords:

Salmonellosis, salmonella, biosecurity, pathogen

Abstract

Salmonellosis is a common worldwide disease that can affect all animals, including humans. The primary mode of transmission is through direct oral ingestion of contaminated feces or through contaminated food sources. Salmonellae are small, straight, Gram–negative rods whose many serotypes fall into two main categories: those highly adapted to a specific host and those with broad host ranges. The incidence of salmonellosis has increased with the intensification of livestock production where animals are abnormally crowded and stressed. Under these conditions fecal contamination of skin or food supplies can occur. Although these situations rarely occur in natural settings, it is important to note that zoos and rehabilitation facilities can render similar stressful situations. Clinical salmonellosis manifests as primary enteritis and colitis, generalized infection (septicemia), or abortion, and can occur in all stages from peracute to chronic. A positive diagnosis of salmonellosis is based on a fecal culture of the bacteria and observed clinical signs. Salmonella spp. can be spread from wildlife to humans by improper handling of infected animals and is considered a Class 4 nosocomial pathogen. Conversely, there are documented cases in Antarctica and Africa where increasing ecotourism has resulted in higher incidences of salmonellosis in native wildlife. Clinically ill animals can be treated cautiously with an antibiotic and receive supportive care but, in severe cases, the prognosis is guarded. Use of the existing list of recommended husbandry and hygienic actions, along with the ability to detect the signs, will decrease the spread of salmonellosis in wildlife facilities and zoos to those animals under care as well as to the practitioners.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Michelle H. Brown BS, MS, Front Range Community College, Fort Collins, Colorado

Michelle Brown has a BA in wildlife management, an MA in natural resource planning from the University of Arizona, and is a student member of the NWRA. She has worked in Guatemala with the Peace Corps, in the Bering Sea as a Fisheries Observer, in Ecuador studying Andean condors, and she was employed for over 11 years by The Nature Conservancy in community–based conservation work. For the last two years she has been at Wildkind Rehabilitation Center in Colorado and is pursuing veterinary technology and a career in wildlife rehabilitation.

References

Butikofer, B., B. Bissig–Choisat, G. Regula, L. Corboz, M. Wittwer, and J. Danuser. 2005. Incidence of Zoonoses in Petting Zoos and Evaluation of Hygiene Measures to Prevent the Transmission to Humans. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 147(12):532–40.

Dupont®. Animal Health Solution. 2006. Salmonella– Breaking the Cycle [Monograph on the Internet]. Available from: <http://www.antecint.co.uk/main/salmonel. htm>.

Ebrahim, M., and J. Solomon. 2006. Exotic Pets, Little Disease Screening: Disaster in the Making. 7 November. Associated Press: New York, NY.

Keen, J. E., L. M. Durso, and T. P. Meehan. 2007. Isolation of Salmonella enterica and Shiga– Toxigenic Escherichia coli 0157 from Feces of Animals in Public Contact Areas of United States Zoological Parks. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. January. Pp. 362–365.

Kruse, H., A. Mette Kirkemo, and K. Handeland. 2004. Wildlife as Source of Zoonotic Infection. Emerging Infectious Disease. 10(12).

Limon, J. 2006. Nosocomial Infections. National Association of Veterinary Technicians in America Journal. Winter.

Martin, R. M. 1984. First Aid and Care of Wildlife. David and Charles Publishing: Newton Abbot Devon, UK.

National Association of State Public Health Veterinarians, Inc. 2005. Compendium of Measures to Prevent Disease Associated with Animals in Public Settings. MMWR Recommendations and Reports. (25):54(RR–4):1–12.

Nizeyi, J. B., R. B. Innocen, J. Erume, G. R. Kalema, M. R. Cranfield, and T. K. Graczyk. 2001. Campylobacteriosis, salmonellosis, and shigellosis in free–ranging human–habituated mountain gorillas of Uganda. Journal of Wildlife Disease. 37(2):239–44.

Palmgren, H., D. McCafferty, A. Aspan, T. Broman, M. Sellin, R. Wollin, S. Bergstrom, and B. Olsen. 2000. Salmonella in sub–Antarctica. Epidemiology and Infection. 125(2):257–62.

Scott, L. E., ed. 2006. Salmonellosis, Students– Massachusetts. Wildlife Rehabilitation Bulletin. 24(2):50.

Smith, W. A., J. A. Mazet, and D. C. Hirsh. 2002. Salmonella in California wildlife species: prevalence in rehabilitation centers and characterization of isolates. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine. 33(3):228–235.

USGS. 2006. National Wildlife Health Center. Salmonellosis. Available from: <http://www.nwhc.usgs.gov/disease_information/other_diseases/salmonellosis.jsp>.

Williams, E. S., and I. K. Barker, eds. 2001. Infectious Diseases of Wild Mammals. Iowa State University Press: Ames, IA.

Wobeser, G. A. 2006. Essentials of Disease in Wild Animals. Blackwell Publishing: Ames, IA.

Downloads

Published

2007-12-31

How to Cite

Brown, M. H. (2007). Salmonellosis in Wildlife: Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment Options for the Zoo Veterinary Technician and Wildlife Rehabilitator. Wildlife Rehabilitation Bulletin, 25(2), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.53607/wrb.v25.166

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Categories