Selection Process for Non–Releasable Birds: The First Step in Bird Welfare

Authors

  • Kit Lacy Cascades Raptor Center

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53607/wrb.v36.133

Keywords:

Ambassador, non–releasable, selection process, animal welfare

Abstract

The selection of ambassador animals coming out of wildlife rehabilitation facilities is an evolving process as information grows regarding long–term physical impacts of disabilities on an animal’s quality of life. Ambassador animal welfare traditionally addressed nourishment, length of life, and physical safety while in human care. More facilities are now focusing on cognitive well–being, including examining if individuals are free from pain, fear, and distress as a measure of welfare. And, as more trainers are adopting choice–based training methods using the least number of aversive stimuli possible, candidate selection is the first step in the welfare process. Cascades Raptor Center has developed rigorous criteria for all birds before they are added to our team. Because many of our resident birds are wild–hatched individuals deemed non–releasable by rehabilitation facilities, it became necessary to devise a thorough assessment process. Data collected from wellness monitoring of our current bird collection coupled with over 25 years of comprehensive necropsy reports have provided information indicating that many disabilities that result in non–releasable status also preclude individuals from having a high quality of life in human care. Setting an ambassador animal up for a successful life in human care begins with appropriate, well considered selection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Kit Lacy, Cascades Raptor Center

Kit Lacy is Education Director at Cascades Raptor Center. She graduated from the University of Oregon with a Master of Science in Animal Behavior and taught college biology for seven years before focusing on her passion for raptors. She has been a member of the IAATE Board of Directors since 2013.

References

Association of Zoos and Aquariums. 2015. Ambassador Animal Policy. Accessed Jan. 2017. Available from: <https://www.aza.org/aza–ambassador–animal–policy>.

Association of Zoos and Aquariums. 2009. Animal Welfare Committee. Accessed January 2017. Available from: <https://www.aza.org/animal_welfare_committee>.

Fowler, A. Recognition of Pain in Wildlife. 2009. Accessed January 2017. Available from: <http://www.fourthcrossingwildlife.com/RecognitionOfPainInWildlife–AnneFowler.pdf>

International Association of Avian Trainers and Educators (IAATE). 2015. Position Statement: Tethering and the Use of Jesses. International Association of Avian Trainers and Educators. Accessed October 2018. Available from: <https://iaate.org/images/Position_Statement_–_Tethering_and_the_Use_of_Jesses_Revised.pdf >

Martin, S. 2016. Improving Animal Welfare Through Training. Proceedings of IAATE 2016 Conference. International Association of Avian Trainers and Educators.

National Institutes of Health. 2000. Definition of Pain and Distress and Reporting Requirements for Laboratory Animals: Proceedings of the Workshop National Research Council (US) Committee on Regulatory Issues in Animal Care and Use. National Academies Press: Washington, DC.

Proctor, N. S. and P. J. Lynch. 1998. Manual of Ornithology: Avian Structure and Function. Yale University Press: New Haven, CT.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-21

How to Cite

Lacy, K. (2021). Selection Process for Non–Releasable Birds: The First Step in Bird Welfare. Wildlife Rehabilitation Bulletin, 36(1), 36–40. https://doi.org/10.53607/wrb.v36.133

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Categories