Study of Post–release Data in the North American River Otter (Lutra canadensis)

Melanie Haire

doi:10.53607/wrb.v27.112

Authors

Melanie Haire Atlanta Wild Animal Rescue Effort (AWARE)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53607/wrb.v27.112

Keywords:

river otter, soft release, feeding station, post–release, hack site, River otter, soft release, feeding station, post–release, hack site

Abstract

A retrospective study conducted on post–release data of 17 hand–reared North American river otters (Lutra canadensis) over a 14–year period substantiates the effectiveness of the soft release method for this species. Records show that 100 percent of released otters returned to utilize a feeding station at the release site. These return visits ranged from a period of three weeks up to eight months post–release. Twenty–eight percent of these animals returned to the hack station after having sustained injuries. A hack station refers to a site from which an animal is released and is accustomed to receiving food. More than half of the injured animals readmitted required and received medical treatment and were released. The data reveals that river otters respond favorably to this type of release and provides convincing results for long–term success. The results validate this method, as well as demonstrate that slow release played a role in the increased survival rate of the study group. Since the method provides otter pups with backup food and care while they are experiencing life in the wild, it allows them to make and learn from mistakes, which might otherwise prove to be fatal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Melanie Haire, Atlanta Wild Animal Rescue Effort (AWARE)

Melanie Haire holds an associate degree in Veterinary Medical Technology and has been employed by Zoo Atlanta as the senior veterinary technician since 1999. She was published in the 2002 edition of Exotic Animal Medicine for the Veterinary Technician as the author of a chapter titled “The Veterinary Technician’s Role in Wildlife Rehabilitation.” Since 1988 her memberships include IWRC and NWRA, and since 1999 Melanie has served as a board member, active volunteer, and rehabilitator trainer for the local Atlanta Wild Animal Rescue Effort (AWARE).

References

Beckwith, S. 2003. Rehabilitation of Orphan River Otters. Pp. 51–60 in Wildlife Rehabilitation, vol. 21 (Bea Orendorff, ed.). National Wildlife Rehabilitators Association: St. Cloud, MN.

Blaisdell, F., DVM. 1999. Rehabilitation of River Otters. NWRA Quarterly Journal 17(2): 1–5. (Bea Orendorff, ed.). National Wildlife Rehabilitators Association: St. Cloud, MN.

Cain–Stage, M. 1990. Rehabilitation Notes: American River Otter Lutra canadensis. IWRC Wildlife Journal. 13(1): 7–10.

Chanin, P. 1985. The Natural History of Otters. Facts on File Publications: New York, NY.

Foy, M. K. May 1984. Seasonal Movement, Home Range and Habitat Use of River Otter in Southeastern Texas. MS thesis. Texas A & M University: College Station, TX.

Green, J., and R. Green. 1992. Release Techniques for Otters: Theory and Practice. Wildlife Rehabilitation Today 3(4): 26–31. Coconut Creek, Fl.

Johnson, S. A., and K. A. Berkly. 1999. Restoring River Otters in Indiana. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 27(2): 419–427

Kruuk, H., E. Balharry, and P. T. Taylor. 1994. The Effect of Water Temperature on Oxygen Consumption of the Eurasian Otter Lutra lutra. Physiological Zoology. 67: 1174–1185.

Kruuk, H. 1995. Wild Otters: Predation and Populations. London: Acedemic Press, Oxford.

Kruuk, H. 2006. Otters, Ecology, Behaviour, and Conservation. Oxford University Press: Oxford, England.

Liers, E. E. 1951. Notes on the River Otter (Lutra canadensis). Journal of Mammalogy. 32(1): 1–9.

McDonald, K. P. 1989. Survival, Home Range, Management, Habitat Use, and feeding Habits of Reintroduced River Otters in Ohio. MS thesis. Ohio State University: OH.

Melquist, W. E., & M. G. Hornocker. 1983. Ecology of River Otter in West Central Idaho. Wildlife Monograph 83: 1–60.

Park, Ed. 1971. The World of the Otter, 1st edition. J. B. Lippincott Company: Philadelphia, PA.

Serfass, T. L., R. L. Peper, M. T. Whary, and R. P. Brooks. 1993. River Otter (Lutra Canadensis) Reintroduction in Pennsylvania: Prerelease Care and Clinical Evaluation. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine. 24(1): 28–40.

Shannon, S. 1998. Ontogeny of Behavior and Self–sufficiency in Free–ranging Otters. Available from: <http://www.otters.net/development.html> (updated 2008).

Simpson, V. R. 2006. Patterns and Significance of Bite Wounds in Eurasian Otters (Lutra lutra) in Southern and South–West England. Veterinary Record. 158: 113–119.

Simpson, V. R., and K. E. Coxon. August 2000. Intraspecific Aggression and Suspected Infanticide in Otters. British Wildlife. 11(6): 423–426.

Watt, J. P. 1993. Ontogeny of Hunting Behavior of Otters (Lutra lutra L.) in a Marine Environment. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London. 65: 87–104.